AI Sales Calls: What the Machine Handles on the Phone
Short answer. On this page, AI sales calls means software that either speaks on a call as a voice agent, or listens to calls people make and records, transcribes and scores them. The 25 tools ranked here include both.
Leexi scores highest of the twenty-five tools on this ai sales calls grid, 8.8 on 30 tagged reviews, as a notetaker for calls and meetings. Convin, which lists an AI phone call agent, is second at 8.7.
Every score on this page validated by the site owner · latest validation Oct 16, 2026 · How we score
The top three
Rank follows score, nothing else; the full table of 25 is below.
Leexi scores 8.8 on 30 tagged reviews: Results and time saved has 15 favourable mentions and no negative one, while Starter is $15 per licence a month, billed monthly, read on Sep 28, 2026.
Convin scores 8.7 on 81 tagged reviews. Results and time saved draws 69 favourable mentions and ease of use 47, while speed and performance draws 11 negative mentions and transcription accuracy 10, as of Sep 2026.
Modjo scores 8.1 on 12 tagged reviews: Results and time saved has 8 favourable mentions and no negative one, while no price or plan list is published on the pages checked, read on Oct 6, 2026.
Highest-scored for your situation
One tool per situation: the highest-scored of the 25 whose reviews describe that situation. Each card names what it gives up.
Leexi scores 8.8, the highest of the tools with team reviews, though only 8 of its 30 tagged reviews come from teams; CRM sync needs Business, $49 per licence a month, billed monthly.
Close scores 8.0, the highest of the tools with agency reviews, though only 4 of its 37 tagged reviews come from agencies; Essentials, $49 per user a month billed monthly, lists unlimited contacts and leads.
RingCentral scores 7.6, the highest of the tools with solo reviews, though only 1 of its 7 tagged reviews comes from a solo user; its Core plan costs $30 per user a month, billed monthly.
All 25, side by side
Sorting reorders the table; it never changes a rank. Rank follows score, nothing else.
Sort by
| Rank | Tool | Score | Entry price | Trial | Best for | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leexi |
8.8 | $15/seat /mo | Team | ||
| 2 | Convin |
8.7 | Quote | Team | ||
| 3 | Modjo |
8.1 | Quote | Team | ||
| 4 | Close |
8.0 | $19/seat /mo | Team | ||
| 5 |  Outreach |
7.8 | Quote | Team | ||
| 6 |  Salesken |
7.8 | Quote | Team | ||
| 7 |  Allego |
7.8 | Quote | Team | ||
| 8 |  Grain |
7.8* | $19/seat /mo | Team | ||
| 9 |  Spiky |
7.8 | $18/seat /mo | Team | ||
| 10 |  Otter.ai |
7.7* | $16.99/seat /mo | Team | ||
| 11 |  Circleback |
7.6* | $18/seat /mo | |||
| 12 |  Dialpad |
7.6* | $49/seat /mo | |||
| 13 |  MeetGeek |
7.6* | $15.99/seat /mo | |||
| 14 |  Nextiva |
7.6* | $23/seat /mo | |||
| 15 |  Observe.AI |
7.6* | Not published | |||
| 16 |  Fathom |
7.6* | $15/seat /mo (billing period not stated) | Team | ||
| 17 | RingCentral |
7.6* | $30/seat /mo | Team | ||
| 18 |  Demodesk |
7.5* | ≈ $33 (€29)/seat /mo | Team | ||
| 19 |  Mindtickle |
7.5* | Not published | Team | ||
| 20 |  Fireflies |
7.4* | $18/seat /mo | Team | ||
| 21 |  Gong |
7.4 | Quote | Team | ||
| 22 |  HubSpot |
7.3 | From $7/seat /mo (billing period not stated) | Team | ||
| 23 |  tl;dv |
7.0 | ≈ $31 (CA$44)/seat /mo | Team | ||
| 24 |  Apollo |
6.8 | $65/seat /mo | Team | ||
| 25 |  Kixie |
6.5 | Quote | Team |
Entry prices read on each vendor's public pricing page where one exists; the oldest reading dates from Sep 28, 2026. Some of these prices have not been read again for 6 months. Check the vendors' pages before you buy. ≈ marks our US dollar conversion at European Central Bank euro reference rates of Sep 30, 2026. * Under 10 tagged reviews: the score is weighted toward the site average; with none, it comes from the averages of the tools we score. How we score
The top six, in detail
The first six rows of the table, in rank order: what the reviews and the vendor's pages say about each one.
Leexi scores 8.8 on 30 tagged reviews up to Sep 2026. Results and time saved has 15 favourable mentions and no negative one, and Customer support has 9 favourable mentions and none negative. Leexi lists automatic meeting notes and summaries and transcription in 100+ languages, read on Sep 28, 2026, with a 7-day free trial of the entire Leexi One suite.
- Results and time saved: 15 favourable mentions, none negative
- Customer support: 9 favourable mentions, none negative
- Feature range draws 2 negative mentions and 12 favourable
- Customization draws 2 negative mentions and 2 favourable
Convin scores 8.7 on 81 tagged reviews, from Nov 2023 to May 2026. Value for money scores 10.0 on 76 tagged reviews, ease of setup 9.9 on 63 and support quality 9.9 on 31, while feature depth scores 8.6 on 81. Speed and performance draws 11 negative mentions and transcription accuracy 10, as of Sep 2026. This page holds no Convin price.
- Value for money scores 10.0 on 76 tagged reviews
- Results and time saved: 69 favourable mentions, none negative
- Speed and performance draws 11 negative mentions, none favourable
- Transcription accuracy draws 10 negative mentions, 3 favourable
Modjo scores 8.1 on 12 tagged reviews up to Sep 2026. Ease of use has 7 favourable mentions and 1 negative one, and AI features 6 favourable and 1 negative. Modjo lists call transcription in 100+ languages and AI CRM filling, read on Sep 29, 2026. No price is published on the pages checked, read on Oct 6, 2026.
- Results and time saved: 8 favourable mentions, none negative
- Ease of use: 7 favourable mentions, 1 negative
- Price level draws 1 negative mention; no price listed
- Learning curve draws 1 negative mention, none favourable
Close scores 8.0 on 37 tagged reviews up to September 2026. Close's ease of use theme has 831 mentions, all favourable. Customization draws 96 mentions for Close, 95 of them negative, and learning curve 94 mentions, 92 of them negative. Solo is $19 per user a month, billed monthly. Prices were read on the vendor's page on Sep 28, 2026.
- Close's ease of use: 831 favourable mentions
- Close's support quality scores 8.5 on 8 tagged reviews
- Close customization: 95 negative of 96 mentions
- Close learning curve: 92 negative of 94 mentions
Outreach scores 7.8 on 37 tagged reviews up to September 2026. Value for money scores 9.6 on 21 tagged reviews and ease of setup 7.9 on 23, while feature depth scores 7.4 on 35. Learning curve draws 25 negative mentions, and Outreach lists multi-stakeholder sequences, read on Sep 29, 2026.
- Ease of use draws 93 favourable mentions
- Value for money scores 9.6 on 21 tagged reviews
- Feature range draws 33 negative mentions
- Learning curve draws 25 negative mentions
Salesken scores 7.8 on 10 tagged reviews up to April 2026. Feature depth scores 8.6 on 10 tagged reviews and Value for money 9.5 on 10; Support quality scores 7.9 on 2. Feature range draws 7 favourable and 2 negative mentions, and Transcription accuracy draws 2 negative mentions. The pricing page, read on Oct 6, 2026, shows six products on request.
- Feature depth scores 8.6 on 10 tagged reviews
- AI features: 6 favourable mentions, none negative
- Transcription accuracy: 2 negative mentions, none favourable
- Feature range: 2 negative mentions against 7 favourable
Beyond the scores
The sections below first separate voice agents from call analysis, compare what the analysis tools capture, then read the dialers and phone systems in the table, and end with what the tools list for phone compliance.
This page ranks voice agents and call analysis tools together
Some tools here listen to calls that people make; others list an AI that speaks on a call. Convin lists an AI phone call agent that runs calls 24/7, next to automated QA scoring of every conversation, and its evidence is 81 tagged reviews. MeetGeek lists a voice agent that can take calls on your behalf, and its 7.6 rests on no tagged reviews, so it equals the site average.
Scoring tools sit on the other side. Modjo lists AI call scoring against your sales playbooks, with 12 tagged reviews behind its score. Salesken lists real-time cues during sales calls and automated scoring of every call, with 10 tagged reviews. The table also holds dialers and phone systems, covered below. A score here says how reviewers rate a tool, not how many calls an AI places.
Call analysis tools differ in what they capture and score
Gong captures conversations, emails and meetings automatically and lists an AI call reviewer that scores calls; it scores 7.4 on 46 tagged reviews, and its support quality scores 5.5 on 6 tagged reviews. Demodesk lists call recording across video, phone, in-person and field channels, with two-way sync to Salesforce, HubSpot and Pipedrive, and rests on 7 tagged reviews.
Mindtickle adds AI role plays, where a bot acts as the buyer, to call scoring and manager coaching; speed and performance draws 15 negative mentions, and the tool rests on 8 tagged reviews. Allego pairs conversation intelligence with AI role play, and learning curve draws 27 negative mentions for it.
Dialers and phone systems place the calls, and their prices differ
Close puts its power dialer on the Growth plan at $109 per user a month, billed monthly, and its predictive dialer on the Scale plan. Apollo includes its dialer from the Basic plan, $65 per seat a month, billed monthly, and rests on 104 tagged reviews. Kixie lists a multi-line power dialer that dials up to 4 leads at a time; its caller ID reputation draws 14 mentions, 12 of them negative.
RingCentral lists call recording on demand, with unlimited phone calls limited to the US and Canada, and rests on 7 tagged reviews. Nextiva lists progressive and predictive dialing on its Professional contact center plan, sold by quote; its 7.6 rests on no tagged reviews, so it equals the site average.
Phone compliance: what the tools list and what this page leaves out
This page does not state telephone law. So it says nothing on consent, call recording or telling a prospect that a voice is an AI, and no score here measures them. What the vendors' pages do list is narrower. Kixie, which scores 6.5 on 51 tagged reviews, lists a compliance add-on for Do Not Call registries. Observe.AI lists voice AI agents and redaction of PII, PCI and PHI in audio and transcripts, and scores 7.6 with no tagged reviews. Dialpad lists PII redaction on its Essentials plan, at $49 per user a month, billed monthly. These listings describe features, not whether a given call is lawful.
Before you choose
A voice agent speaks on the call itself, while an analysis tool listens to calls that people make and scores them. On this page, Convin, MeetGeek and Observe.AI list voice agents, while Modjo, Salesken and Gong list call scoring.
This page does not rule on that: it ranks tools by review-based scores and by what their pages list, and it does not state telephone law. It reads what each tool lists, not how a law classes a call.
This page does not state that rule: disclosure belongs to telephone law, which the page does not cover. It compares what the tools list, not what the law requires.
This page does not rank tools on that. Convin and Observe.AI list voice agents, but this page reads no listing that says either one qualifies a lead before a rep joins, so it makes no claim about it.
Some do. Modjo lists AI CRM filling after every call, Salesken lists call summaries logged in the CRM, and Otter.ai lists transcripts and notes logged to HubSpot or Salesforce.
This page cannot say: no score here measures coaching results. The tools list different things: Dialpad lists Listen In and Barge In for managers to coach reps, and Convin lists automated agent coaching, including peer-to-peer coaching.
Where to go next
The pages this ranking links to: its category, neighbouring rankings and guides.
* Under 10 tagged reviews: the score is weighted toward the site average; with none, it comes from the averages of the tools we score.
Affiliate linksThis page contains affiliate links: some vendors pay us a commission when you subscribe through their Try button. Scores come from public user reviews, on the same grid for every scored tool. Affiliate disclosure
Score colours: under 77 to 7.47.5 to 7.98 and above* Under 10 tagged reviews: the score is weighted toward the site average; with none, it comes from the averages of the tools we score.
Four dimensions only. The fifth changes with the category, so it would not compare.