Make Review (2026)
Visual automation for complex multi-step workflows across 3,000+ apps, with AI Agents, MCP Server for LLM-to-app actions, and Make Grid for operational visibility. Best for RevOps and Ops teams. Credit-based pricing requires volume estimation before sign-up.
Make is the right platform for RevOps and Ops teams building multi-step workflows with branching logic, AI Agents, and MCP Server connectivity to real business systems. Estimate credit volume before committing: the module-based billing requires upfront calculation to avoid mid-month exhaustion or tier mismatch.
Audience Fit
Who it's for and who should pass
Best for
RevOps / Ops: complex branching logic, one scenario
AI-to-app workflows: MCP Server connects LLMs to Make
Scale visibility: Make Grid maps all scenario dependencies
Enterprise: SOC 2, SSO, on-prem agent available
Skip if
Simple 2-3 steps: Zapier is faster to deploy
Seat-based pricing: credit model needs volume upfront
Code / self-host: n8n is cheaper, more flexible
Feature Overview
Scenarios, AI Agents, MCP Server, and Make Grid
| Layer | What it covers | Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Scenario Builder | Visual canvas for multi-step workflows. Routers, filters, error handlers, scheduling (1-min on paid), loops, data formatting, and HTTP for any custom API. 3,000+ pre-built app modules. | All plans |
| AI Agents (beta) | Agentic workflows that decide dynamically rather than follow a static flow. Supports Make's built-in AI Provider or your own LLM key. 350+ AI app connections. | All plans (beta) |
| Make MCP Server | Exposes scenarios as callable tools via Model Context Protocol. Claude, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible client can discover and trigger Make scenarios as real-world actions. | All plans |
| Make Grid | Visual map of all scenarios, agents, integrations, and data flows. Includes analytics, execution history, and audit logs for governance across large scenario libraries. | All plans (advanced: Enterprise) |
| Make API | 300+ endpoints to manage scenarios, executions, connections, and team settings programmatically. Rate-limited by plan tier. | Core and above |
| Flow Control Tools | Webhooks, HTTP module for custom API calls, data manipulation in transit, cron-style scheduling, and loops for array iteration. | All plans |
A 5-module scenario running 200 times/day uses 1,000 credits/day. The free plan's 1,000 credits/month exhausts in one day at that pace. Use Make's pricing calculator at make.com to model your monthly volume before selecting a tier.
Pricing
Credits per module action: $9 Core to custom Enterprise
The base price shown is for 10,000 credits/month. Each plan also scales to 40k, 150k, 500k, 1.5M, and 5M+ credit bundles at higher price points within the same tier.
1,000 credits/mo. 2 active scenarios. 15-min scheduling.
- 1,000 credits/mo
- 2 active scenarios
- 15-min minimum scheduling interval
- 5MB max file transfer
- 3,000+ app modules
- Make AI Agents (beta)
- Make API access (Core+)
- 1-min scheduling (Core+)
10,000 credits/mo. Unlimited scenarios. 1-min scheduling. Make API.
- 10,000 credits/mo (scalable)
- Unlimited active scenarios
- 1-min minimum scheduling
- Make API access (300+ endpoints)
- Make MCP Server
- Make Grid
- AI Agents (beta)
- Priority execution (Pro+)
- Custom variables (Pro+)
10,000 credits/mo. Team roles, shared templates, multi-member workspace.
- 10,000 credits/mo (scalable)
- Team roles and permissions
- Scenario template sharing
- All Pro features
- Priority execution
- Custom variables
- Full-text log search
- Enterprise SSO + audit logs
| Plan | $/mo (10k credits) | Active scenarios | Min interval | Make API | Team features |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 2 | 15 min | No | No |
| Core | $9 | Unlimited | 1 min | Yes | No |
| Pro | $16 | Unlimited | 1 min | Yes | No |
| Teams | $29 | Unlimited | 1 min | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise | Custom | Unlimited | 1 min | Yes (higher limits) | Yes + SSO + audit logs |
The $9/mo Core price is for 10,000 credits/month. The same Core plan scales to 40k, 150k, and 500k+ credit bundles at higher price points. Model your monthly module execution volume using Make's pricing calculator at make.com before committing.
Platform Fit
Make vs. Zapier vs. n8n: 3 distinct profiles
| Dimension | Make | Zapier | n8n |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Credits per module action | Tasks per Zap execution | Per workflow execution (verify at n8n.io) |
| App library | 3,000+ | 8,000+ | 500+ native nodes |
| Complexity ceiling | High: routers, filters, error handlers, loops | Medium: linear multi-step with paths | Very high: code nodes in JS/Python |
| Self-hosting | Enterprise on-prem agent | No | Full self-host (Docker/K8s, air-gapped) |
| AI Agents | Yes (beta): Make AI Agents + MCP Server | Zapier Copilot + Zapier MCP | Yes: multi-step agents, HITL guardrails |
| Learning curve | Intermediate | Beginner | Advanced |
| Best fit | Ops teams: complex logic-heavy workflows | Broadest app coverage, quick setup | Code control or self-hosting required |
For equivalent simple workflows, Make and Zapier cost roughly the same per execution. Make wins on complex multi-path logic: one scenario replaces several separate Zaps, lowering maintenance cost and often total credits.
Strengths vs Tradeoffs
4 strengths, 4 tradeoffs to weigh
Strengths
Visual builder: routers, errors, AI in one canvas
AI + MCP Server: 3,000 modules callable by any LLM
Make Grid: full automation observability at scale
Compliance: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, SSO available
Tradeoffs
Credit estimation: model volume before tier selection
App library: 3,000 vs Zapier's 8,000+
Simple workflows: Zapier faster for basic automations
AI Agents: still in beta, plan accordingly
Final Take
Make at $9/mo: who should buy
Use Make if you need complex branching logic, AI Agents, or MCP Server connectivity to real business systems. Core at $9/mo covers most ops team needs: estimate credit volume before committing, and pass for Zapier (simple flows) or n8n (self-hosting, code steps).
Alternatives
Not the right fit? Closest options
FAQs
Credits, MCP, and plans: 4 common questions
One credit is consumed each time a module executes. Count modules per scenario, multiply by daily runs and 30, then add a 20% buffer for retries. Use Make's pricing calculator at make.com to model this before committing to a tier.
The MCP Server exposes your Make scenarios as callable tools via Model Context Protocol. Any compatible AI client, including Claude, can discover and trigger them directly, executing CRM updates, Slack messages, or lead enrichment without coding individual API calls per app.
For multi-path conditional workflows, Make is more maintainable: routers, error handlers, and flow control all live in one scenario. For simple trigger-action automations and the broadest app coverage, Zapier wins. Match to your workflow complexity, not a general ranking.
Core ($9/mo) unlocks unlimited scenarios, 1-min scheduling, and Make API access. Pro ($16/mo) adds priority execution, custom variables, and full-text log search. Teams ($29/mo) adds multi-user roles and shared scenario templates.
Ready to try Make?
Free plan with 1,000 credits/mo. Core from $9/mo with unlimited scenarios, 1-min scheduling, and Make API access. AI Agents and MCP Server on all plans.
🔒 Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. Learn more