tl;dv vs Avoma (2026)
Both record and summarize meetings. tl;dv goes deeper into CRM automation, coaching, and security. Avoma goes broader into scheduling, lead routing, and revenue forecasting. The overlap is real; the priorities diverge sharply above the notetaker layer.
tl;dv wins for teams needing deep CRM automation, coaching playbooks, and verified enterprise security (SOC 2 Type II, EU hosting, private AI). Avoma wins for revenue teams that want meeting notes, scheduling, lead routing, deal risk alerts, and forecasting in one modular platform from $19/user/month.
Fast Answer
tl;dv vs Avoma: who wins for what
Side-by-Side
tl;dv vs Avoma: key differences
| tl;dv | Avoma | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | SMB/mid-market: CRM automation, coaching, enterprise security | Revenue teams: meeting notes, scheduling, routing, forecasting |
| Starting price (annual) | Free (10 AI notes/mo) | $0 view-only; $19/user/mo AI Meeting Assistant |
| Full-featured tier (annual) | C$39/seat/mo Business (USD unconfirmed) | $29/user/mo Conversation Intelligence |
| Pricing model | Per seat, 4 tiers | Per user, modular; free view-only seats |
| Scheduling and lead routing | β | β (Scheduler module: 1:1, round-robin, rules-based) |
| Deal / churn risk alerts | β | β (Revenue Intelligence module) |
| AI win-loss analysis | β | β (Revenue Intelligence module) |
| CRM field mapping and auto-updates | β (Business plan) | β (AI Meeting Assistant and above) |
| Sales coaching (playbooks, objection handling) | β (Business plan) | β (Conversation Intelligence module) |
| Multi-meeting AI analysis | β (Business plan; scheduled AI email reports) | β (not confirmed) |
| MCP server / API / webhooks | β (Business plan) | β (API not confirmed) |
| Languages supported | 30+ | 75+ |
| Security certifications | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EU hosted, ISO 27001, AES-256, private AI on request | Not confirmed |
| Free trial | β Free plan always; 7-day Business trial | β No credit card required |
tl;dv pricing is shown in CAD (C$27 Pro, C$39 Business). USD equivalents are unconfirmed. Verify at tldv.io before budgeting. Avoma monthly billing terms are not publicly confirmed.
Strengths & Tradeoffs
tl;dv vs Avoma: strengths and hard limits
tl;dv
Strengths
Security stack: SOC 2, GDPR, private AI
CRM auto-fill: Business plan, all major CRMs
Multi-meeting AI: trends across all calls
API + webhooks: Business plan only
Tradeoffs
CAD pricing: USD unconfirmed, verify first
No scheduling: no routing at any tier
Free plan: 10 AI notes/mo cap
Avoma
Strengths
Modular pricing: pay only for needed modules
Free viewer seats: no per-seat cost
Scheduler built-in: replaces Calendly
75+ languages: broader than tl;dv's 30+
Tradeoffs
Security: unconfirmed, verify before committing
API: unconfirmed, custom pipelines at risk
Monthly billing: terms unconfirmed
Pricing Reality
tl;dv vs Avoma pricing: what you actually pay
| Plan | tl;dv | Avoma |
|---|---|---|
| Free | 10 AI notes/mo, 10 Ask AI queries, 3-mo retention | View-only (free, no recording) |
| Entry paid | C$27/seat/mo (Pro, annual) | $19/user/mo (AI Meeting Assistant, annual) |
| Full-featured | C$39/seat/mo (Business, annual) | $29/user/mo (Conv. Intelligence, annual) |
| Enterprise | Custom (SSO, SCIM, HIPAA, private storage) | Custom |
| Add-ons | None | Scheduler + Lead Router; Revenue Intelligence |
tl;dv prices are in CAD. USD equivalents must be confirmed at tldv.io. Avoma's monthly billing amounts are not publicly listed; contact sales to confirm before annual commitment.
Where They Diverge
3 cases where tl;dv and Avoma split on capability
Meeting intelligence depth: tl;dv adds customizable note templates (MEDDICC, BANT), transcript clips, and multi-meeting AI analysis that surfaces objection trends across all calls. Avoma matches coaching and CRM sync but adds AI call scoring with talk-time and filler-word metrics, giving it an edge for structured rep scoring.
Scheduling and lead routing: Avoma includes unlimited 1:1 scheduling pages, group and round-robin scheduling, rules-based routing, and inbound web form routing. tl;dv has no scheduling capability at any tier. Teams using Calendly alongside a meeting recorder will find Avoma eliminates that subscription; teams already set on their scheduler tool will find this module irrelevant.
tl;dv has a verified security stack (SOC 2, GDPR, EU hosting, AES-256, private AI on request) and a confirmed API on Business. Avoma's security certifications and API availability are unconfirmed. Regulated industries and teams needing programmatic CRM pipelines should verify Avoma's status directly before committing.
Final Take
tl;dv for security depth, Avoma for revenue scope
tl;dv is the right pick when data security, CRM automation depth, and API access are non-negotiable. Its SOC 2 Type II, EU hosting, and private AI make it the stronger option for compliance-sensitive environments. Multi-meeting AI reports and MCP server access add capabilities Avoma does not match.
Avoma wins when a revenue team wants to consolidate scheduling, meeting notes, coaching, and deal intelligence into one modular subscription. Starting at $19/user with free viewer seats and a clear upgrade path to revenue intelligence, it offers lower friction and broader workflow coverage.
Common Questions
Frequently asked questions
tl;dv is better for CRM automation depth, documented enterprise security, and API access. Avoma is better when revenue teams need meeting notes, scheduling, lead routing, deal monitoring, and forecasting in one modular platform.
No. tl;dv has no scheduling or lead routing at any tier; teams must use Calendly or similar alongside it. Avoma's Scheduler and Lead Router module covers 1:1, round-robin, and rules-based routing as an add-on.
Avoma's $19/user AI Meeting Assistant is the clearest entry price. tl;dv's Pro is C$27 and Business C$39 per seat annually, but USD equivalents are unconfirmed. Verify at tldv.io before budgeting.
HIPAA compliance is on tl;dv's Enterprise tier only; Business includes EU hosting, ISO 27001, and AES-256 but no BAA. Confirm the BAA process directly with tl;dv's team before committing for healthcare use.
Both tools have free access. Test before you commit.
tl;dv's permanent free plan covers note quality and CRM sync today. Avoma's no-credit-card trial covers the full platform including scheduling and coaching.
π No affiliate links on this page. Both links go directly to official sites.